Step 6: The BMJ Created False Confusion - Misuse Complex Terms to Claim Fraud - Video 10 - 19m 35s - Andrew Wakefield v The BMJ
Step 6: The BMJ Created False Confusion - Misuse Complex Terms to Claim Fraud - Video 10 - 19m 35s - Andrew Wakefield v The BMJ
How the Case Against Andrew Wakefield Was Fixed - a 21st Century Controversy
SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO AND AUDIO
ANDREW WAKEFIELD
NAVIGATION
Back to How to Get Best Use of this Site
Step 6: The BMJ Created False Confusion - Misuse Complex Terms to Claim Fraud - Video 10 - 19m 35s
In this Video 10 you will see the BMJ’s paid commissioned author made false claims to mislead to support the false allegation the 1998 Lancet paper reported “regressive autism” “within days” of MMR vaccination when it did not.
Video 10 looks at what the confusion created was with. This is another example of the BMJ Editors’ paid commissioned author’s use of the switch.
Video 5 (Step 1) and Video 9 (Step 5) concerned the false claim the 1998 Lancet Paper reported onset of “regressive autism” “within days” of MMR vaccination.
In Video 5 you saw for yourself the Table the BMJ Editors included in their author’s paper which contained the fake presentations and findings their author had switched for 1998 Lancet paper’s real ones.
You saw for yourself from Video 9 dealing with Step 5 (“Rewrite what the Lancet paper says and claim fraud”) that Allegation 3 is a fabrication:
A3. “Some children were reported to have experienced first behavioural symptoms within days of MMR, but the records documented these as starting some months after vaccination”
Allegation 3 created confusion by claiming falsely the Lancet Paper reported the onset of autism “within days” of the administration to them of the MMR vaccine when it did not. And this was in order for the false claim that this was fraud by Andrew Wakefield when it was not.
So what was it that happened within days of MMR vaccination? What was switched out by the BMJ’s paid commissioned author? What was the confusion created with? What was the switch this time?
This is no small point. It is no small difference. It is a lie created to claim falsely Andrew Wakefield changed the children’s medical records when he did not. That is the difference.